|
Jamaican Caving Notes |
|
Caving News | Jamaican Caves Organisation | JCO Main Page |
Support Jamaican Caving | Contact the JCO |
Clapham Cave August 30, 2010 |
District: Clapham |
Parish: St Ann |
|
WGS84 L/L: By request only |
JAD2001: By request only |
|
JAD69: By request only |
Altitude: 385m WGS84 |
|
Accuracy: +/- 5m horizontal; +/- 10m vertical |
|
|
Type: Dry passage |
Accessibility: Walk-in |
|
Depth: 25m |
Length: 50m |
|
Explorers: Leeds, 1963 |
Survey: None |
|
JU Ref: Pg 122 |
JU Map: N/A |
|
Entrance size: 6m wide, 3m high |
Entrance aspect: Not noted |
|
Vegetation in general locale: Scrub/farm |
Vegetation at entrance: Scrub |
|
Geology: White limestone |
Bedding: Poor |
Jointing: Poor |
Speleothems: Stals |
Palaeo resources: None seen |
|
Archaeo resources: Petroglyphs |
Hydrology: Dry |
|
Dark zone: 0% |
Climate: ~24, dry |
|
Bats: 500-1000 |
Bat guano: Little |
|
Guano mining: Occasional |
Guano condition: very minor deposits of fresh/fluff, and wet |
|
Visitation: Occasional |
Speleothem damage: None |
|
Graffiti: Some |
Trash: Much |
|
Ownership: Windalco |
Protection: None |
|
Vulnerability: High |
Clapham Cave
Clapham Cave was visited in response to an enquiry from a friend in Pollyground as to whether we knew of the cave. We didn’t, it was convenient to do on this, the last day of fieldwork, and an associate, Carlos, was familiar with the district. Accordingly, it became the last site assessed during the August-July 2010 session of fieldwork. The team consisted of Stewart, Selvyn, and Carlos (who stayed at the entrance).August 30, 2010 Team: RS Stewart, D Selvyn, Carlos Notes: RS Stewart First, we must mention the disagreement between what we found, and what is given in Jamaica Underground. From JU: “Depth: 25m. Length: 15m. At Clapham, 200m south of the village, 150m west of the road. A gully leads to a 6m wide entrance to a 3m pitch which ends on a 15m boulder descent into a choked chamber, 12m in length.” ![]() The site we visited is locally well known, and we heard of no others. We do not understand the discrepancy in length, but the odds are good that it is indeed the listed site. The most notable feature of the cave is the presence of Taino petroglyphs on the left side of the south-facing entrance chamber. There was no mention of these in JU, but because the site seemed promising in this regard, a careful search by Stewart soon found two, sketched in this report. The floor is sandy, and could be dug. The total number of bats is roughly between 500 and 1000, with at least Artibeus jamaicensis present, and probably at least one other species (based on a visual inspection). Capture and release netting will be complicated by the lighthole further into the cave also serving as an exit. It is roughly 2m+ in width, and may be able to be covered. The main entrance should be suitable for a harp trap if work is done to block the area on either side with tarps. Cave crickets are numerous. One amblypygid was noted. No roaches were seen. There is much trash in the cave, although most of it is old metal, rather than household garbage. Also, someone lived here at some point – a mattress and old clothes were seen not far in, on the right. Guano mining has taken place in the past, and there are currently no real accumulations, just thin patches of fresh/fluff, and about 1cm of wet guano on some boulders. According to the local people, Windalco owns the land external to the entrance. |
Jamaican Cave Notes - Main Page |